the lawyer track
The vast majority of the people in Albuquerque who know anything about the BRT / ART Project are opposed to the project. Probably 85% of the businesses located along Central Avenue / Route 66 in Albuquerque are opposed to the project. But there is a “rub.”
The rub in this case is the propensity to believe that in modern America only lawsuits and lawyers have any power to change things, meaning, in this case, to challenge the power of the politicians and very big business to change and rearrange and needlessly mess with things – meaning, in this case, mess with the lives of fairly simple and ordinary people just trying to make a living, feed a family, and reasonably get by.
So, virtually the day after the Albuquerque City Council voted to “accept” $69 million dollars in federal funding, and to approve an immediate $17 million in available city taxpayer funds for the project, the lawyers moved in, filed suit, and began asking everyone they could for all available money.
The meme, and the message, is clear: “Lawyers are the Big Guns, and lawyers run best when they have lots of money.” The clearly implied secondary message is that with the “Big Guns” approach in play, you don’t really need “small guns,” “smaller guns,” or a “no gun” alternative approach, or approaches.
The lawyer track is about the “one size, fits all” mentality. It is not about the “loose lips, sink ships” reality, or accepting the fact that there are third generation torpedoes and hypersonic cruise missile weapons systems that are real game-changers (metaphorically). The argument here is that just maybe, “ART imitates life.” In a town that likes to think that it makes movies, the parallel logic should not be so hard to understand and apply.
Please do not get me wrong. I would love it if the three (3) lawyers involved, two of which are working virtually for free, actually could prevail in federal court against the 10 or 12 very experienced and capable federal lawyers, and city lawyers, and private $800 per hour corporation lawyers that are arrayed against them.
However, when stakes are as high as they are for Albuquerque, for Central Avenue, for Route 66, and the future, would it be unreasonable to think that someone might be willing to arrange for a few thousand dollars to be devoted to a “Plan B?”
The federal hearing to hear the Motion for an Injunction to “stop the ART Project” in Albuquerque is set to begin On July 11, 2016, just three (3) weeks from now.
Three weeks is not a lot of time to come up with plans, communicate ideas and possibilities, and to get everyone on board in the “Stop ART” effort to just totally be calm and chill if the lawyers come up empty and join (metaphorically) Davy Jones in his locker. This (alternative) good use of time could happen, but right now it is Not happening. I really wish it were not so.
I’ve tried very hard to obtain a location for an exhibit that communicates why Central Avenue and Route 66 are so important and so loved in Albuquerque – just the way it is, but that could easily and inexpensively be made so much better.
The exhibit would also present the BRT/ART Project just the way it has been planned, with HDR Drawings and plans, the real deal, not the flash-drive type illustrations that the Mayor Berry Team promotes.
If people could actually see every page of the plans, end-to-end, arranged on a table, even the few supporters of the project, I believe, would move to be quickly against it.
The exhibit has been planned, would be fun, would be inexpensive to do, and is very doable. The problem is time, time is running out in the “Land of Mañana.” And with time running out the question for many, both businesses and people, is it time to leave, or time to stay and fight?
I need a little help here, people. Plan “B” takes a bit of time, a bit of money too. I may work for free, but ink and paper, posters, things like that really aren’t free, or “free and easy.”
My email address is email@example.com